From Bigoted Protest to Eminent Domain


Design concept for the Cardoba “Mosque”

Carl Paladino, developer, attorney, CEO of the Ellicott Development Company, and tea party activist is running for governor of New York and has pledged:

“As governor I will use the power of eminent domain to stop this mosque and make the site a war memorial instead of a monument to those who attacked our country.”

Of course this plan to circumvent the laws of private property flies right in the face of what conservatives supposedly hold dear. Susette Kelo was given the 2006 Ronald Reagan award by CPAC for her role in fighting eminent domain in Kelo v. New London, when she was threatened with eviction by eminent domain so that her property could be turned over to developers.

And that eminent domain stuff wasn’t just some off the cuff remark. No, it’s his TV ad. By the way, the same “conservative values” let’s-protect-marriage-from-the-gays preacher kept his extramarital love child a secret from his family for 10 years. Nice guy I’m sure.

Bill Keller, a Florida pastor, Birther infomercial host, and son of the former CEO to Chevron, said that even though he’s never been to New York, he’s proposing a $1 million project next door that he dubs “the 9/11 Christian Center at Ground Zero.” In describing the project, which he said should be up by the first of January 2011, Keller said that, “This is not to be confrontational with the Muslims, it really isn’t.” When asked about the center’s website, which calls Islam a “false religion” whose 1 billion adherents “are going to Hell,” Keller said it was not intended as confrontation but rather “telling the truth.”

In order to stop the “Islamist cultural-political offensive designed to destroy our civilization,” Newt Gingrich suggested that, were he president, he would “declare the area around the World Trade Center a national military battlefield because that was a battle and it part of a real war.” Oh yeah, and Gingrich also said of the Axis of Evil: “We’re one out of three.”

It was bad enough when these demagogues wanted to block them with a cynical attempt at declaring the Burlington Coat Factory a historical landmark (and then accuse the Commission of political bias), now they just come out and say, “Vote for me and I’ll steal the private property of a random cleric of a religion you don’t like and replace their community center with a monument to how awesome our two perpetual wars are.”

What does it tell Muslims who are now watching this debate? It tells them that Osama Bin Laden is right: that the War on Terror is just a euphemism for a war on Islam, not Islamic terror, not violent Islamic sectarians, but Islam in general. That’s telling the Arab community in New York: “Remember the fear and anger you felt when the twin towers fell and your neighborhood got blanketed in toxic dust? Well, that was nothing compared to the fear and anger felt by the Christians — the real Americans — who were watching those attacks on television. In fact, that was not an attack by terrorists against you, that was an attack by you against us.”

There’s another 40-year-old pre-WTC mosque sitting just four blocks away from Ground Zero. Why not complete the circle and just force this mosque to move out, break their windows, and spray paint slogans equating Islam with fascism without realizing that you’re basically parroting part what the SS did to the Jews?

Backers of the “Ground Zero Mosque” that isn’t really at Ground Zero and isn’t really just a mosque (it includes a gym and a swimming pool) pledged to incorporate a memorial to 9/11 victims and possibly an interfaith chapel, but that’s a ridiculous gesture because it assumes that the people doing the complaining want to reach a compromise. What they want is more festering wounds so they can howl and rage until a Republican is in office again.

As for those calling them to just move it a few blocks away, Jon Stewart points out this isn’t the only place where Islamic cultural centers and mosques are being picketed. Even if they found a place where people wouldn’t have a problem, certainly they would lose tons of money and time, and for what, to placate the irrational proposition that Muslims shouldn’t pray in their own pre-WTC community?

If no mosque should be built within two blocks of Ground Zero, does that mean no church should be built within two blocks of anywhere America has bombed?

The Anti-Defamation league sadly posted a mixed message condemning the bigotry involved in the controversy while also complaining that building the Islamic Center “in the shadow of the World Trade Center will cause some victims some pain — unnecesarily — and that is not right.” Paul Krugman poignantly remarks: “It causes some people pain to see Jews operating small businesses in non-Jewish neighborhoods; it causes some people pain to see Jews writing for national publications (as I learn from my mailbox most weeks); it causes some people pain to see Jews on the Supreme Court. So would ADL agree that we should ban Jews from these activities, so as to spare these people pain? No? What’s the difference?”

The Philadelphia-based Shalom Center are among the leaders vocally opposing the Anti-Defamation League. Imam Feisal Abdul-Rauf’s wife Daisy Khan said: “Your support is a reflection of the great history of mutual cooperation and understanding that Jewish and Muslim civilizations have shared in the past, and remains a testament to the enduring success of our continuing dialogue and dedication to upholding religious freedom, tolerance and cooperation among us all as Americans.”

Fox News is trying to paint the Sufi leader of the Community Center as a radical because he refuses to call HAMAS a terrorist organization. The accusation is certainly in line with the Republican strategy of goading Jewish American voters to abandon Democratic politicians for their perceived lack of devotion to Israel. But the reason for this is because the Sufi imam sees his role as trying to bridge Muslim and American communities together and calling the Democratically-elected Palestinian government group would not be helpful in that respect. It’s sort of like how in the Synoptic gospels the Pharisees tried to trap Jesus between cultural perceptions by asking if Roman taxes were legitimate. The imam’s philosophy is actually very Unitarian and he believes that American democracy is an embodiment of Islam’s ideal society.

Don’t expect the “liberal media” to fight too hard about it. CNN just recently fired their Senior Middle East News Editor, Octavia Nasr, for tweeting a lament for the death of the mainstream Shi’ite cleric Sayyed Mohammed Hussein, who was the religious guide for our ally, Iraq’s Dawa Party. The Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki even took the very unusual step of leaving Iraq to attend Fadlallah’s funeral.

Most of the mainstream media seemed more interested in the fact that Palin mispronounced another word, and then tried to compare herself to Shakespeare in response to the media circus. This led to a very entertaining Twitter meme, #ShakesPalin, in which participants revamped classic Shakespeare quotes, Palin-style. The funniest entry came from The Cato Institute’s Julian Sanchez: “To suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous liberals, or to quit halfterm, and by opposing, rake in speaking fees.”

Bryan at YouAreDumb.Net did a much better job of defending it:

Also, can we get the fuck over 9/11 already? It’s nine years later. The number of people who should have strong passions and keen sensibilities at this point is small enough that they shouldn’t be granted carte blanche to run roughshod over the lives of the hundreds of millions of us who have moved on. You don’t hear the Pearl Harbor Families and Newt Fucking Gingrich raising a ruckus every time someone opens a sushi restaurant near Pearl Harbor.

Hell, it’s not even all the families who are feeling anguish over 9/11 that are in play here. There are a few, sure, but they’ve been shamelessly co-opted by Newt and Sarah and Fox and everyone else who thinks it’s excellent for the 2010 elections if they can demonize some brown people that are outside Arizona for a change. And that demonizing has become so prevalent that not only are hardly any Democrats willing to go to bat for the Cordoba House (site of the proposed community center), but it’s given Joystick Joe cover to throw a little of his patented gentle Arab-hate into the mix.

“Well, I guess I’d say I’m troubled by it. But I don’t know enough to say it ought to be prohibited. But frankly I’ve heard enough about it, and read enough about it, that I wish someone in New York would just put the brakes on it for a while and take a look at this.” – Joe Lieberman.

So you don’t know enough to say it ought to be prohibited, but you’ve heard enough to wish that New York had prohibited it. Makes sense to me. Or at least as much sense as condemning the bigotry of people opposing the community center then blaming the community center for inciting it.

And in case there was any doubt in your mind that the right was just using this bullshit to position themselves for future political runs, Tim Pawlenty weighed in on it. Tim Pawlenty. Barely even governor anymore of a state so geographically and culturally distant from NYC that we wonder why delis put sesame seeds on donuts. And Timmeh was his usual loquacious self.

“I’m strongly opposed to the idea of putting a mosque anywhere near ground zero — I think it’s inappropriate. I believe that 3,000 of our fellow innocent citizens were killed in that area, and some ways from a patriotic standpoint, it’s hallowed ground, it’s sacred ground, and we should respect that. We shouldn’t have images or activities that degrade or disrespect that in any way.” – Timmeh, delicately fluffing the cock of wingnut site RealClearPolitics.

It must be pretty hallowed ground. That’s why they haven’t actually built anything there. But how far does hallowed ground extend? Do we kick the existing mosque near Ground Zero out? Who gets to decide what images or activities degrade or disrespect our patriotic hallowed ground? Tim Pawlenty? He’s running for President, which is about as disrespectful to America as you can get.

So the Republicans are picking on a minority to score political points, the Democrats are unwilling to spend the political capital to defend the minority because they don’t want to lose the votes of fiscally liberal bigots, and the media keeps it all going for the sake of ratings. Business as usual, in other words.

Actually, in reference to Bryan’s remark about “a sushi restaurant near Pearl Harbor”, there actually is a Shinto shrine right around the bend from Pearl Harbor.

Before its destruction in 2001, the World Trade Center featured a prayer space, where hundreds of Muslims would gather every Friday to practice their faith. The number of Muslims who died during the 9/11 attack is estimated as being between 28 and 75. We shouldn’t let Osama Bin Laden prove that he was right when he said: “The West is incapable of recognizing the rights of others. It will not be able to respect others’ beliefs or feelings. The West still believes in ethnic supremacy and looks down on other nations. They categorize human beings into white masters and colored slaves.”

Greed is Love

Goldman One-Ups Gordon Gekko, Says Jesus Embraced Greed

http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/11/04/goldman-one-ups-gordon-gekko-says-jesus-embraced-greed/

Sarah Palin, WWE Star

http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/11/20/sarah-palin-wwe-star/

The Conservative Bible Project

http://conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project

“First Example – Liberal Falsehood

The earliest, most authentic manuscripts lack this verse set forth at Luke 23:34: Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.”

Is this a liberal corruption of the original? This does not appear in any other Gospel, and the simple fact is that some of the persecutors of Jesus did know what they were doing. This quotation is a favorite of liberals but should not appear in a conservative Bible.”

Republicans Play the Victim Card

Just once I would like to see a Democratic President that admits he’s a Liberal.

I really don’t understand why Democrats are always forced to run as centrists, while Republicans revel in their conservatism. It’s particularly sad that in a country founded on the principals of John Locke, Thomas Paine, and Thomas Jefferson, that both political parties eschew the name “liberal.” It’s not like it ever helps the Democratic nominee. Kerry can hunt however many ducks he wants, Republicans will still more likely vote for the duck. Obama can say there’s “no Liberal America and no Conservative America, but the United States of America” all he wants, he’s still going to be called the most liberal congressman in the country, just like Kerry was before him, since becoming the Democratic nominee automatically imbues you with that designation. That’s because unlike liberals, conservatives will never, ever vote for the opposing party no matter how insanely bad the last administration has been. It doesn’t matter that their only talking point is the economy and that the entire American financial system is falling apart at the seams. Only they, the people who have been in charge all this time, can come in and change Washington.

They are so set in their ways that conservatives actually have the gall to argue that the problem with President Bush was that he wasn’t right-wing enough! Yes, everything would be hunky dory if he just didn’t add a few more minor earmarks to the 9 trillion dollar debt! And never mind that we’ve had yet another bank fail due to under-regulation; the real problem with the economy is that we regulate too much. And if Bush had just cut taxes on the rich a little bit more, then job growth would have exploded like he promised all along. It doesn’t matter what the problem is, the answer is: cut taxes and deregulate. And if McCain and his gang of lobbyists running his platform don’t fix things, we can just say he wasn’t a conservative to begin with.

I say this after spending way too much time arguing with my conservative family over the current election while I was holed up in Dallas/Fort Worth to get away from Gustav. One of the first things my grandmother asked me is who I was voting for and after I told her, she conferred to me that she believed Obama was a “Trojan horse” Muslim. Another member of my family was convinced that Obama was not born in Hawaii, despite my assurances that that lie had long been debunked, as if the U.S. government just forgot to check. Those lies, at least, were new. Everything else I listened to was the same conservative crap that’s been played like a violin for the past 10 years: “Wah, wah, the liberal media is being mean to the Republicans”, “I saw a woman using food stamps at the grocery store 20 years ago who had a better car than me and Democrats want me to pay for it”, “America gives away too much money in foreign aid [a whopping 0.1% GDP, the least of any nation. Denmark gives 1%]”, “Obama won’t stand up to Satan-worshipping Muslims because he dressed up as one once.”, “Since we already have all the laws we need, any new legislation is superfluous, so we need do-nothing conservatives in office to keep everything the way it is”, “Global warming is a global scam for [unnationalized] Communists to take control of the world’s money supply”. Seriously, I wish these were jokes.

I guess I feel defeated from not being able to change anyone’s minds about anything. But it’s hard when conservatives are so suspicious of any source that isn’t propaganda from Fox News or Conservative radio. Their lizard-like brains are frozen in the past, unable to accept anything from the last 8 years as a basis for reasoning on this election. We could have had Stalin in office the past 2 terms and conservatives would still be complaining about the double standard for who can use the word “nigger”.

If 8 years of a Democratically-controlled White House and congress had brought forth the financial troubles we’re currently in, then I would definitely be looking at a Ron Paul ticket. I may disagree with a lot of what Ron Paul says, but I love watching him school Republicans on their own history and I have no trouble admitting that he’s smarter than any of the other Democratic or Republican candidates and that his advocates are smarter than both groups combined.

But McCain is looking good this week. Their convention was a smash success and conservatives are falling in line with the crybaby story that the liberal media is being unfair to Palin on her inexperience just because McCain has been running on nothing but the “experience” issue since the campaign started. But declaring war on the Center and calling it “Left” is what the Republicans are good at.

Then there’s the floodgates of lies unleashed at the Republican convention. Palin says she was against the “Bridge to Nowhere.” Actually, her administration spent tens of millions of dollars on a road to link up to the bridge, and she’s been quoted as saying that “Much of the public’s attitude toward Alaska bridges is based on inaccurate portrayals of the projects here” and that she would “not allow the spinmeisters to turn this project or any other into something that’s so negative.” But Republicans knew the “Bridge to Nowhere” would be red meat at the convention, so they just got her to flip flop. Funny how “flip-flopper” only gets attached to people who “voted for the war” (more like voted for giving the President the power to decide whether to go to war) before it was completely mishandled driven into the ground. People from Alaska were pretty upset when they found her railing against the project she had forcefully defended beforehand. (In fact, there was a 1,500-strong anti-Palin rally in Midtown Anchorage, Alaska, along with 100 counter-protesters.) But she only flip-flopped on the issue, not the money. The government allowed her to keep the $223 million in earmarks, and $73 million of it is still earmarked for the same project!

http://www.propublica.org/article/palin-administration-still-pursuing-nowhere-project-913/

http://www.reuters.com/article/vcCandidateFeed7/idUSN3125537020080901

http://www.adn.com/front/story/525510.html

When speaking about Creationism being taught along side evolution in science class, she said, “Don’t be afraid of information.” An interesting comment for someone who asked “a rhetorical question” to a public librarian regarding what she would do if ordered to ban a list of books. Although Palin claims to not remember the incident now, it’s pretty clear that the reason for it was because her church was pushing for the book “Pastor I Am Gay” to be removed from bookshelves.

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5766173&page=1

Although Palin has admitted that she has not been following the Iraq war very closely (even though her son is being sent), she nevertheless has said that not only the Iraq war was a “task that is from God” but that a $30 million natural gas pipeline in Alaska was part of “God’s will” and has asked for ministry students to pray for its completion. When defending the term “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance, she said, “If it was good enough for the founding fathers [it’s] good enough for me, and I’ll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.” Of course, the Pledge dates to the late 1800s and the term “Under God” was only inserted in the 1950s as wedge against the “godless Soviets”.

http://www.christianpost.com/article/20080905/palin-pray-u-s-plan-in-iraq-is-god-s-plan.htm

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=28559

Palin’s husband is a part of the Alaska Separatist movement which wants to secede from the United States. The party claimed that Palin herself was a member for 2 years but then retracted the claim, saying it was based on faulty information. Nevertheless, she did attend its conventions and recorded a video for them wishing them luck, saying “I share your party’s vision of upholding the constitution of our great state.” Rather ironic since the Republican party was formed on the basis that states can not secede from the union.

http://ww4report.com/node/5982

We all know what Obama’s pastor thinks now, but few know that Palin’s pastor has gone so far as to preach that critics of Bush are going to hell (no, not a joke), that Kerry is among the damned, and that the war in Iraq was a war “contending for your faith” and that Jesus “operated from that position of war mode”!!! As Jesus said, “If your enemy strikes you, turn the other cheek, and then hit him when he least expects it!”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/02/palins-church-may-have-sh_n_123205.html

Meanwhile, the McCain campaign has set new lows in producing lies about Obama. There’s the lie that Obama is for kindergarten “sex-education”, which was really optional, “age-appropriate” education on safety from sexual predators (like the difference between “good touch” and “bad touch”), which Obama did not co-sponsor and which never passed at any rate.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/off_base_on_sex_ed.html

Then there’s the lie that Obama voted for “infanticide”, a smear specifically designed for Catholic reactionism. The vote itself would not have changed any abortion laws and was bundled with clauses that would have opened doctors up to lawsuits. As the bill itself reads: “(c) Nothing in this Section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being born alive, as defined in this Section. (d) Nothing in this Section shall be construed to affect existing federal or State law regarding abortion. (e) Nothing in this Section shall be construed to alter generally accepted medical standards.” This is a deliberate attempt to shoehorn the abortion issue, worked on by Deal Hudson, one of the 80 people on McCain’s advisory board for Catholic issues, who previously resigned from the RNC for having sex with an 18-year-old student of his from Fordham University.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/04/the-next-smear-against-ob_n_116891.html

Here’s a list of more GOP lies, as listed at FactCheck.Org:

* [A McCain ad] says Obama “gave big oil billions in subsidies and giveaways,” citing his votes for a 2005 energy bill. But the bill slightly raised taxes on the oil industry overall.

* The ad plucked a positive blurb about Palin from an Associated Press article that, in fact, was very much a mixed review. The AP said she “brings an ethical shadow to the [Republican] ticket,” for example.

* The ad says Obama is the “most liberal” Senator. But the National Journal rated him the 16th most liberal in his first year and the 10th most liberal in his second. It rated his votes “most liberal” only in 2007, when he was busy campaigning and missed one-third of the votes on which the rating is based.

* Palin may have said “Thanks, but no thanks” on the Bridge to Nowhere, though not until Congress had pretty much killed it already. But that was a sharp turnaround from the position she took during her gubernatorial campaign, and the town where she was mayor received lots of earmarks during her tenure.

* Palin’s accusation that Obama hasn’t authored “a single major law or even a reform” in the U.S. Senate or the Illinois Senate is simply not a fair assessment. Obama has helped push through major ethics reforms in both bodies, for example.

* The Alaska governor avoided some of McCain’s false claims about Obama’s tax program – but her attacks still failed to give the whole story.

* Giuliani distorted the time line and substance of Obama’s statements about the conflict between Russia and Georgia. In fact, there was much less difference between his statements and those of McCain than Giuliani would have had us believe.

* Giuliani also said McCain had been a fighter pilot. Actually, McCain’s plane was the A-4 Skyhawk, a small bomber. It was the only plane he trained in or flew in combat, according to McCain’s own memoir.

* Finally, Huckabee told conventioneers and TV viewers that Palin got more votes when she ran for mayor of Wasilla than Biden did running for president. Not even close. The tally: Biden, 79,754, despite withdrawing from the race after the Iowa caucuses. Palin, 909 in her 1999 race, 651 in 1996.

* Lieberman said Obama hadn’t “reached across party lines” to accomplish “anything significant,” though Obama has teamed with GOP Sens. Tom Coburn and Richard Lugar to pass laws enhancing government transparency and curtailing the proliferation of nuclear and conventional weapons.

* Thompson repeated misleading claims about Obama’s tax program, saying it would bring “one of the largest tax increases in American history.” But as increases go, Obama’s package is hardly a history-maker. It would raise taxes for families with incomes above $250,000. Most people would see a cut.

* Lieberman also accused Obama of “voting to cut off funding for our American troops on the battlefield.” But Obama’s only vote against a war-funding bill came after Bush vetoed a version of the bill Obama had supported – and McCain urged the veto.

* McCain claimed that Obama’s health care plan would “force small businesses to cut jobs” and would put “a bureaucrat … between you and your doctor.” In fact, the plan exempts small businesses, and those who have insurance now could keep the coverage they have.

* McCain attacked Obama for voting for “corporate welfare” for oil companies. In fact, the bill Obama voted for raised taxes on oil companies by $300 million over 11 years while providing $5.8 billion in subsidies for renewable energy, energy efficiency and alternative fuels.

* McCain said oil imports send “$700 billion a year to countries that don’t like us very much.” But the U.S. is on track to import a total of only $536 billion worth of oil at current prices, and close to a third of that comes from Canada, Mexico and the United Kingdom.

* He promised to increase use of “wind, tide [and] solar” energy, though his actual energy plan contains no new money for renewable energy. He has said elsewhere that renewable sources won’t produce as much as people think.

* He called for “reducing government spending and getting rid of failed programs,” but as in the past failed to cite a single program that he would eliminate or reduce.

* He said Obama would “close” markets to trade. In fact, Obama, though he once said he wanted to “renegotiate” the North American Free Trade Agreement, now says he simply wants to try to strengthen environmental and labor provisions in it.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/factchecking_mccain.html

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/gop_convention_spin_part_ii.html

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/maverick_misleads.html

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/gop_convention_spin.html

To be fair, there’s also a much smaller list of Obama flubs which FactCheck.org describes saying, “He stuck to the facts, except when he stretched them.” They’re pretty trivial, but like most people in the mainstream media, FactCheck.org has to look for something to prove they’re even-handed. By far, the most important lie from Obama is that he could “pay for every dime” of his spending and tax cuts “by closing corporate loopholes and tax havens.” A large part of it comes from increasing taxes on the rich while cutting taxes for the middle class. Independent experts argue that BOTH PLANS are cutting too much in taxes, which will lead to big budget deficits. Obama probably planned for the middle class tax cuts to help him get more votes, not realizing that it doesn’t matter what the facts are, people will always believe Republicans when they make baseless claims that Obama will “raise taxes.”

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/factchecking_obama.html

=================
IN OTHER NEWS
=================

The Conservative National Review admonished Martin Luther King Jr. for his reception of the Nobel Peace Prize but is now divining that King would not vote for Obama.

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/08/23/national-review-believes-mlk-jr-would-not-vote-for-barack-obama/

Poll: World Wants Obama as President
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/09/09/2360240.htm?section=world

Whistleblower Alleges McCain Hid Wife’s Drug Abuse
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Whistleblower_breaks_15year_silence_to_allege_0911.html

Sex and Drug Scandal in Oil Royalty Agency Costing Taxpayer’s Billions
(This is the agency that would be expanded if ANWR was opened up)

“The alleged transgressions involve 13 former and current Interior Department employees in Denver and Washington. Their alleged improprieties include rigging contracts, working part-time as private oil consultants, and having sexual relationships with – and accepting golf and ski trips and dinners from – oil company employees, according to three reports released Wednesday by the Interior Department’s inspector general.”

“The reports portray a dysfunctional organization that has been riddled with conflicts of interest, unprofessional behavior and a free-for-all atmosphere for much of the Bush administration’s watch.”

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/09/10/govt-involved-in-sex-and-drugs-and-oil-and-roll/

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/10/national/main4436263.shtml

http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/pipermail/lbo-talk/Week-of-Mon-20080908/014726.html

Expelled From Expelled

When I noticed that Ben Stein’s new Creationist movie previewed a shot of Richard Dawkins, I already knew that the movie must have used some amount of deception in getting him to participate. Dawkins had vowed years ago that he would not do interviews for any anti-evolution films or documentaries because of an incident in which he gave an interview that was edited to look as if he couldn’t give an answer to some questions that were given to him. Sure enough, Dawkins was told that he was participating in a movie called “Crossroads”, which was suppossed to be about an honest discussion about evolution vs. intelligent design, not about scientists getting expelled for beliving in Creationism. Sure enough, Dawkins’ opinions were once again purposely misconstrued, such as when he goes into a thought experiment about how even if Earth was seeded by some other intelligent life form like aliens, then the aliens themselves would have had to evolved from something themselves. This was turned into: “What? Richard Dawkins BELIEVES IN INTELLIGENT DESIGN.” “Richard Dawkins BELIEVES IN ALIENS FROM OUTER SPACE.” On top of that, when Dawkins and another scientist from the movie, PZ Myers, booked seats together for the screening of the movie, Myers was himself EXPELLED from the movie theatre! Lies about the two being “gate-crashers” were subsequently spun despite the fact that the producer has gone on record saying that “of course” he had seen Dawkins and allowed him to attend because “he had handled himself fairly honorably” (as if Myers was somehow less honorable in the way he stood in line next to Dawkins). According to Dawkins, the movie is terribly boring and attempts to tie Darwinism to the Nazis, which seems about as intelletually dishonest as one can get. All of this is pretty hilarious. The religious right have finally got their Hollywood documentary and they’ve managed to raise the bar of deceitfulness and general douchebagginess far higher than anything Michael Moore could have done to “Donation of Constantine” levels.

http://richarddawkins.net/article,2394,Lying-for-Jesus,Richard-Dawkins

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c39jYgsvUOY>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c39jYgsvUOY